Neonatal Lung Disease: a Q & A with our chief of neonatology
Nothing announces the arrival of a new child more loudly than his or her first squeal of outrage, the product of an unexpected slap on the bottom and a healthy pair of brand new lungs.
It’s a sound rarely heard from babies born prematurely, who often enter the world with lungs neither fully formed nor functional. Indeed, premature newborns are at greater risk of suffering neonatal lung disease, a collection of ailments ranging from pulmonary hypoplasia (incomplete lung development) to infant respiratory distress syndrome, a condition caused by insufficient production of lung surface proteins vital to lung function.
Treating neonatal lung disease is among medicine’s toughest challenges. Premature babies or “pre-terms” typically weigh just a few pounds. Their grip on life may be tentative and precarious. Therapies to help them breathe – and survive – can cause permanent damage.
We asked Lawrence S. Prince, MD, PhD, chief of neonatology at UC San Diego Health System and at Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego, to talk about the causes of neonatal lung disease and research efforts to help pre-terms grow their own lungs.
Q: Are neonatal lung diseases primarily the consequence of underdevelopment and premature birth or do other factors, such as genetics, play a significant role?
A: Neonatal lung disease is clearly the result of being born premature or pre-term. In some pre-term infants, the lungs fail to develop, while other body parts grow normally. Most likely, this arrested lung development results from the unanticipated early exposure of the lung to air and bacteria in the outside world. Activation of the lung immune system then somehow destroys the normal blueprint for forming a mature lung. However, not all infants develop persistent lung disease, suggesting there may be a genetic component that we do not yet understand. Lung disease in pre-term infants is therefore a classic mix of “nature v. nurture,” with both genetic risk and environmental exposures determining which patients get the disease.
Q: Are there fundamental differences in how the lungs of a premature newborn develop compared to a baby who is full-term?
A: The tiny spaces in the lung that actually allow oxygen to get into our bloodstream and carbon dioxide to leave our body are called alveoli. These structures don’t form until the last month or two of pregnancy. Infants who are born pre-term do not yet have any alveoli, and subsequent lung development occurs much more slowly than babies who remain inside their mother. Because of their immature lung structures, pre-term infants sometime need extra oxygen or a mechanical ventilator to breathe even when they reach the size and maturity of a full-term infant. In the most critically ill pre-term infants, lung development stops completely and alveoli never form.
Q: What are the specific risks and challenges in promoting and maintaining the respiratory health of newborns with neonatal lung diseases?
A: The biggest challenge in neonatal lung disease is balancing the amount of intensive care we provide with minimizing the amount of potential injury done to vulnerable, immature lungs. Pre-term infants often need mechanical ventilation and extra oxygen to survive, but we know that this support can produce long-term damage and increase the chance of lung infection or pneumonia. We therefore closely monitor exactly what each pre-term infant receives every minute of the day and night, quickly adjusting our treatment to remove ventilators and reduce oxygen exposure as soon as possible. This takes many specially trained personnel working around the clock for each patient. Our next biggest concern is how to prevent infection. If pre-term infants get bacterial or viral pneumonia, even after they go home, they are more likely to end up with long-term lung disease.
Q: Much of your research involves lung regeneration and growth, what kind of reparative power do lungs have?
A: We don’t know why the lungs of some pre-term infants continue to grow and develop normally but others do not. My laboratory has been approaching this problem from several directions. We spend a lot of time trying to figure out which cells and molecules in the lung are damaged by oxygen and infection. In addition, we are using various growth factor and stem cell approaches to see what can make the damaged lung grow normally. Our hope is to both prevent oxygen and infection from causing long term lung damage and to stimulate normal lung growth and development in those pre-term infants that have suffered lung injury.

Neonatal Lung Disease: a Q & A with our chief of neonatology

Nothing announces the arrival of a new child more loudly than his or her first squeal of outrage, the product of an unexpected slap on the bottom and a healthy pair of brand new lungs.

It’s a sound rarely heard from babies born prematurely, who often enter the world with lungs neither fully formed nor functional. Indeed, premature newborns are at greater risk of suffering neonatal lung disease, a collection of ailments ranging from pulmonary hypoplasia (incomplete lung development) to infant respiratory distress syndrome, a condition caused by insufficient production of lung surface proteins vital to lung function.

Treating neonatal lung disease is among medicine’s toughest challenges. Premature babies or “pre-terms” typically weigh just a few pounds. Their grip on life may be tentative and precarious. Therapies to help them breathe – and survive – can cause permanent damage.

We asked Lawrence S. Prince, MD, PhD, chief of neonatology at UC San Diego Health System and at Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego, to talk about the causes of neonatal lung disease and research efforts to help pre-terms grow their own lungs.

Q: Are neonatal lung diseases primarily the consequence of underdevelopment and premature birth or do other factors, such as genetics, play a significant role?

A: Neonatal lung disease is clearly the result of being born premature or pre-term. In some pre-term infants, the lungs fail to develop, while other body parts grow normally. Most likely, this arrested lung development results from the unanticipated early exposure of the lung to air and bacteria in the outside world. Activation of the lung immune system then somehow destroys the normal blueprint for forming a mature lung. However, not all infants develop persistent lung disease, suggesting there may be a genetic component that we do not yet understand. Lung disease in pre-term infants is therefore a classic mix of “nature v. nurture,” with both genetic risk and environmental exposures determining which patients get the disease.

Q: Are there fundamental differences in how the lungs of a premature newborn develop compared to a baby who is full-term?

A: The tiny spaces in the lung that actually allow oxygen to get into our bloodstream and carbon dioxide to leave our body are called alveoli. These structures don’t form until the last month or two of pregnancy. Infants who are born pre-term do not yet have any alveoli, and subsequent lung development occurs much more slowly than babies who remain inside their mother. Because of their immature lung structures, pre-term infants sometime need extra oxygen or a mechanical ventilator to breathe even when they reach the size and maturity of a full-term infant. In the most critically ill pre-term infants, lung development stops completely and alveoli never form.

Q: What are the specific risks and challenges in promoting and maintaining the respiratory health of newborns with neonatal lung diseases?

A: The biggest challenge in neonatal lung disease is balancing the amount of intensive care we provide with minimizing the amount of potential injury done to vulnerable, immature lungs. Pre-term infants often need mechanical ventilation and extra oxygen to survive, but we know that this support can produce long-term damage and increase the chance of lung infection or pneumonia. We therefore closely monitor exactly what each pre-term infant receives every minute of the day and night, quickly adjusting our treatment to remove ventilators and reduce oxygen exposure as soon as possible. This takes many specially trained personnel working around the clock for each patient. Our next biggest concern is how to prevent infection. If pre-term infants get bacterial or viral pneumonia, even after they go home, they are more likely to end up with long-term lung disease.

Q: Much of your research involves lung regeneration and growth, what kind of reparative power do lungs have?

A: We don’t know why the lungs of some pre-term infants continue to grow and develop normally but others do not. My laboratory has been approaching this problem from several directions. We spend a lot of time trying to figure out which cells and molecules in the lung are damaged by oxygen and infection. In addition, we are using various growth factor and stem cell approaches to see what can make the damaged lung grow normally. Our hope is to both prevent oxygen and infection from causing long term lung damage and to stimulate normal lung growth and development in those pre-term infants that have suffered lung injury.

Notes

  1. icrod527 reblogged this from lungfanatic
  2. king-boyfriend-banana-heart reblogged this from biglugs and added:
    Yea I was a baby once to. It was tiring.
  3. mommytoone reblogged this from biglugs and added:
    Aw that would be so hard
  4. maarifersan reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  5. inthemoodformedicine reblogged this from drhozcastillo
  6. drhozcastillo reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  7. allthingsrespiratory reblogged this from respiratoryjanelle
  8. theydonotmove reblogged this from nurse-on-duty
  9. inklinedflowers reblogged this from theskygazer
  10. respiratoryjanelle reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  11. puwet reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  12. ah-thenah reblogged this from medicalexamination
  13. mmccrn reblogged this from nursingmonkeymomma
  14. acaciapa-s reblogged this from medicalexamination
  15. thewalkinginmed reblogged this from medicalexamination
  16. thinkaboutelephants reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  17. redridinghood89 reblogged this from nurse-on-duty
  18. worlds-within-worlds reblogged this from mediscene
  19. mediscene reblogged this from nurse-on-duty and added:
    This is my baby. Not literally but neonatology is my baby. It is the area of medicine I personally want to specialise...
  20. laurencky reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences and added:
    for all my fellow premies.
  21. thepackhunts reblogged this from pandemiclaughter
  22. minicrisis reblogged this from nurse-on-duty
  23. pandemiclaughter reblogged this from nurse-on-duty and added:
    My two oldest didn’t cry when they were born and needed assistance breathing.
  24. rawpositivity reblogged this from nurse-on-duty
  25. orinurse reblogged this from nurse-on-duty
  26. nurse-on-duty reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences

About

News from UC San Diego Health Sciences
Media Contacts: 619-543-6163
HealthSciComm@ucsd.edu

Blogroll

  • md-admissions
  • salon
  • oupacademic
  • dodgemedlin
  • melon-collies
  • ucsdspecialcollections
  • scientificillustration
  • nprfreshair
  • huffingtonpost
  • washingtonpost
  • afro-dominicano
  • scipak
  • nbcnightlynews
  • mathcat345
  • science-junkie
  • tballardbrown
  • yahoonews
  • psychotherapy
  • mindblowingscience
  • inothernews
  • neurosciencestuff
  • theweekmagazine
  • azspot
  • scienceisbeauty
  • madsweat
  • fastcompany
  • scishow
  • robertreich
  • currentsinbiology
  • instagram
  • wired
  • pulitzercenter
  • wayfaringmd
  • longform
  • abcworldnews
  • therumpus
  • libertasacademica
  • scienceyoucanlove
  • medicalschool
  • thescienceblog
  • scientificthought
  • wsudiscovery
  • plannedparenthood
  • nursefocker
  • sdzsafaripark
  • lakeconews
  • latimes
  • pubhealth
  • prnewswire
  • sciencenetlinks
  • pozmagazine
  • medicalstate
  • newyorker
  • pritheworld
  • bbsrc
  • todaysdocument
  • aspiringdoctors
  • comedycentral
  • amnhnyc
  • forum-network
  • msnbc
  • guardian
  • medindia
  • pbstv
  • forbes
  • nydailynews
  • colchrishadfield
  • pbsthisdayinhistory
  • cranquis
  • seltzerlizard
  • smithsonianmag
  • wnyc
  • scinerds
  • breakingnews
  • mothernaturenetwork
  • exploratorium
  • doublejack
  • medresearch
  • sdzoo
  • ari-abroad
  • science
  • nprglobalhealth
  • boston
  • uconnhealthlib
  • americanpublicmedia
  • katiecouric
  • newshour
  • ucsciencetoday
  • austinstatesman
  • thebrainscoop
  • post-mitotic
  • artandsciencejournal
  • journalofajournalist
  • photojojo
  • jtotheizzoe
  • princeton-medbloro
  • usatoday
  • nysci
  • newsweek
  • science-and-logic
  • explore-blog
  • artneuroscience
  • kqedscience
  • biocanvas
  • thevancouversun
  • ucsdzone
  • think-progress
  • researchchla
  • ucsdcancer
  • highcountrynews
  • codeit
  • staff
  • minnpost
  • csmonitor
  • 3rdofmay
  • npr
  • oceanportal
  • usagov
  • statedept
  • stemcellculture
  • kpcc
  • ucrhub
  • doctorswithoutborders
  • cenwatchglass
  • theonion
  • skunkbear
  • thisisfusion
  • infographicjournal
  • newswatchtv
  • today
  • actgnetwork
  • thedailyshow
  • rollingstone
  • fuckyeahcardiovascularsystem
  • mediclopedia
  • ohscience
  • bbglasses
  • natgeofound
  • usnews
  • officialssay
  • cnbc
  • ottawahealth
  • sesamestreet
  • ucresearch
  • scienceandfood
  • sciencefriday
  • soupsoup
  • nypl
  • anaofta
  • fuckyeahneuroscience
  • fyeahmedlab
  • publicradiointernational
  • wnycradiolab
  • mashablehq
  • buzzfeed
  • prochoiceamerica
  • washingtonexaminer
  • unicef
  • ucsdcrossculturalcenter
  • houseofmind
  • onaissues
  • brookhavenlab
  • timelightbox
  • ziyadnazem
  • lewisandquark
  • whitehouse
  • lookatthisstory
  • shortformblog
  • queerability
  • columbusdispatch
  • hospitalreina
  • articulomortis
  • cancerninja
  • laboratoryequipment
  • peacecorps
  • yaleuniversity
  • missmdisme
  • nprontheroad
  • sciencesoup
  • alscientist
  • healthcareinfoguide
  • theskygazer
  • timemagazine
  • aarp
  • nbcnews
  • thisissandiego
  • psydoctor8
  • tmagazine
  • shortyawards
  • molecularlifesciences
  • blamoscience
  • markcoatney
  • reuters
  • jayparkinsonmd
  • blue-lights-and-tea
  • htdeverything
  • mediamed
  • phdr
  • topherchris
  • kateoplis
  • artpoweratucsd
  • denverpost
  • motherjones
  • discoverynews
  • michiganengineering
  • oh4theloveofscience
  • nurse-on-duty
  • thenewrepublic
  • wgbhnews
  • theatlantic
  • fuckyeahnervoussystem
  • sciencenote
  • matthewkeys
  • robotmuesli
  • pneupnurse
  • medethicslady
  • themedicalchronicles
  • ohyeahdevelopmentalbiology
  • ucsdcareerservicescenter
  • pacificstand
  • clearscience
  • bitesizedbiology
  • poptech
  • futureofscience
  • galindoyadira
  • genannetics
  • ucsd
  • ucsdmedialab
  • joshherigon
  • thescienceofreality
  • ladyjournos
  • sciencechicks
  • auditoryinsomniac
  • chronicleofhighered
  • vetstail
  • neurolove
  • ajebsary
  • neuroanatomyblog
  • goodideapublichealth
  • tedx
  • huffpostscience
  • thecoloradopursuit
  • brainmtters
  • bobedwardsradio
  • paraphyletic
  • sci-fact
  • nationalpost
  • carlzimmer
  • life
  • dailymedical
  • bklynmed
  • wellcomebrains
  • aljazeera
  • reportingonhealth
  • ucsfbioengineering
  • coolhealthinfographics
  • thedailywhat
  • villagevoice
  • nbclatino
  • guardiancomment
  • scientificbritain
  • adschu