UC San Diego Health Sciences News

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Questions about our posts?
The schematic above depicts some of the subnetworks of interacting proteins that either promote or slow the progression of CLL.  
Tumor Cells’ Inner Workings Predict Cancer ProgressionMolecular markers help reveal nature of chronic lymphocytic leukemia – slow or fast  Using a new assay method to study tumor cells, researchers at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine and UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center have found evidence of clonal evolution in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The assay method distinguishes features of leukemia cells that indicate whether the disease will be aggressive or slow-moving, a key factor in when and how patients are treated. The findings are published in the July 26, 2012 First Edition online issue of Blood.
The progression of CLL is highly variable, dependent upon the rate and effects of accumulating monoclonal B cells in the blood, marrow, and lymphoid tissues. Some patients are symptom-free for years and do not require treatment, which involves the use of drugs that can cause significant side effects and are not curative. In other patients, however, CLL is relatively aggressive and demands therapeutic intervention soon after diagnosis.
“Our study shows that there may not be a sharp dividing line between the more aggressive and less aggressive forms of CLL,” said Thomas J. Kipps, MD, PhD, Evelyn and Edwin Tasch Chair in Cancer Research and senior author of the study. “Instead, it seems that over time the leukemia cells of patients with indolent disease begin to use genes similar to those that are generally used by CLL cells of patients with aggressive disease.  In other words, prior to requiring therapy, the patterns of genes expressed by CLL cells appear to converge, regardless of whether or not the patient had aggressive versus indolent disease at diagnosis.”
Existing markers for aggressive or indolent disease are mostly fixed and have declining predictive value the longer the patient is from his or her initial diagnosis. When the blood sample is collected, these markers cannot reliably predict whether a CLL patient will need therapy soon, particularly when the patient has had the diagnosis of CLL for many years.
Kipps and colleagues studied thousands of genes, particularly those that code for proteins, in a group of 130 CLL patients with varying risks of disease progression. They identified 38 prognostic subnetworks of interacting genes and proteins that, at the time of sample collection, indicate the relative the aggressiveness of the disease and predict when the patient will require therapy. They confirmed their work using the method on two other, smaller CLL patient cohorts in Germany and Italy.
The subnetworks offer greater predictive value because they are based not on expression levels of individual genes or proteins, but on how they dynamically interact and change over time, influencing the course of the CLL and patient symptoms.  
“In a sense, we looked at families rather than individuals,” said Kipps. “If you find in an interconnected family where most genes or proteins are expressed at higher levels, it becomes more likely that these genes and proteins have functional significance.”
More here
Pop-upView Separately

The schematic above depicts some of the subnetworks of interacting proteins that either promote or slow the progression of CLL. 

Tumor Cells’ Inner Workings Predict Cancer Progression
Molecular markers help reveal nature of chronic lymphocytic leukemia – slow or fast
 
Using a new assay method to study tumor cells, researchers at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine and UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center have found evidence of clonal evolution in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The assay method distinguishes features of leukemia cells that indicate whether the disease will be aggressive or slow-moving, a key factor in when and how patients are treated.
 
The findings are published in the July 26, 2012 First Edition online issue of Blood.

The progression of CLL is highly variable, dependent upon the rate and effects of accumulating monoclonal B cells in the blood, marrow, and lymphoid tissues. Some patients are symptom-free for years and do not require treatment, which involves the use of drugs that can cause significant side effects and are not curative. In other patients, however, CLL is relatively aggressive and demands therapeutic intervention soon after diagnosis.

“Our study shows that there may not be a sharp dividing line between the more aggressive and less aggressive forms of CLL,” said Thomas J. Kipps, MD, PhD, Evelyn and Edwin Tasch Chair in Cancer Research and senior author of the study. “Instead, it seems that over time the leukemia cells of patients with indolent disease begin to use genes similar to those that are generally used by CLL cells of patients with aggressive disease.  In other words, prior to requiring therapy, the patterns of genes expressed by CLL cells appear to converge, regardless of whether or not the patient had aggressive versus indolent disease at diagnosis.”

Existing markers for aggressive or indolent disease are mostly fixed and have declining predictive value the longer the patient is from his or her initial diagnosis. When the blood sample is collected, these markers cannot reliably predict whether a CLL patient will need therapy soon, particularly when the patient has had the diagnosis of CLL for many years.

Kipps and colleagues studied thousands of genes, particularly those that code for proteins, in a group of 130 CLL patients with varying risks of disease progression. They identified 38 prognostic subnetworks of interacting genes and proteins that, at the time of sample collection, indicate the relative the aggressiveness of the disease and predict when the patient will require therapy. They confirmed their work using the method on two other, smaller CLL patient cohorts in Germany and Italy.

The subnetworks offer greater predictive value because they are based not on expression levels of individual genes or proteins, but on how they dynamically interact and change over time, influencing the course of the CLL and patient symptoms.  

“In a sense, we looked at families rather than individuals,” said Kipps. “If you find in an interconnected family where most genes or proteins are expressed at higher levels, it becomes more likely that these genes and proteins have functional significance.”

More here

    • #CLL
    • #Leukemia
    • #Oncogenes
    • #Oncology
    • #Cancer
    • #Genetics
  • 9 months ago
  • 102
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

102 Notes/ Hide

  1. monet-paints-moineau reblogged this from sensingsarcasm
  2. sensingsarcasm reblogged this from umeetnonumbers
  3. sensingsarcasm likes this
  4. umeetnonumbers reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  5. umeetnonumbers likes this
  6. super-duper-nova reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  7. elderhelp reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  8. elderhelp likes this
  9. yaymicrobes reblogged this from wimblegimble
  10. swirlymar likes this
  11. starsapphira reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  12. born-an-0riginal-gangsterr reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  13. thnkhigh likes this
  14. my-sex-stories reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  15. byomarch likes this
  16. gaping-anal reblogged this from anal-abuse
  17. chemenlavi reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  18. lesliecoffee reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  19. dhyeydhamelia7 likes this
  20. milesian likes this
  21. kung-futreachery reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  22. uhlola reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  23. chemically-dependent reblogged this from littlemicrobiologyblog
  24. benzodiazepines reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  25. alphahelicalhair likes this
  26. red-porn-gif reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  27. polymath4ever reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  28. polymath4ever likes this
  29. lackofcolorr likes this
  30. andythebiomedicalvampireslayer likes this
  31. rbrucep likes this
  32. theskygazer reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  33. millert1028 likes this
  34. master-net likes this
  35. hoodwinks-and-shenanigans likes this
  36. thecrunkstables likes this
  37. noreasterly likes this
  38. logicianmagician reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  39. foreverstrugglingmuslimah reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  40. colorblind525 likes this
  41. captainjamesteatkirk likes this
  42. ingridbergmanlover reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  43. drvasenkahotep reblogged this from abbyroseholmes
  44. abbyroseholmes reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  45. extreme-anal reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  46. eyeoftheetiger likes this
  47. joumanalahoud likes this
  48. nedafish reblogged this from ucsdhealthsciences
  49. molecularlifesciences reblogged this from littlemicrobiologyblog
  50. testrunofreality likes this
  51. Show more notesLoading...
← Previous • Next →

Logo

News from UC San Diego Health Sciences
Media Contacts: 619-543-6163
HealthSciComm@ucsd.edu

UC San Diego, Elsewhere

  • @UCSDHealth on Twitter
  • Facebook Profile
  • UCSDMedicalCenter on Youtube
  • Google
  • Linkedin Profile

Following

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Questions about our posts?
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr